5 minutes reading time
I watched the tea seller at the corner get harassed by municipal goons this morning.
They tossed his aluminum kettle into the back of a truck and smashed half his glass cups because he didn't have the right stamp on a useless piece of paper. He sat on the curb, just ruined — a man who has probably been making tea at that corner since before I moved to this neighbourhood — while the goons drove off looking satisfied with themselves.
Two months ago, in Delhi, the people who run this country committed a serious crime. Got caught. And then sat down and rewrote the law until it wasn't a crime anymore.
No goons. No truck. No broken cups. Just a small clause buried in a Finance Bill that nobody outside a law journal would ever find.
That is the two-tier enforcement system of Indian democracy. If you are the tea seller, the rules will find you. If you are the party, you find the rules and rearrange them.
In football, if one team gets to hire the referee, and that referee happens to be the striker's brother-in-law, do you call it a game? Or do you call it a scam?
The Election Commission of India is the constitutional body whose job is to run free and fair elections. Big building in Delhi, fleets of CRPF jawans, the power to impose the Model Code of Conduct and shout at candidates who campaign ten minutes past the deadline.
It looks impressive. It is supposed to look impressive.
The Election Commissioners are appointed by the President. On the advice of the Prime Minister. Which means the ruling party picks its own referee. There is no independent panel, no Supreme Court oversight, no Leader of the Opposition sign-off. Just the PM's recommendation, which is, in constitutional practice, binding.
And then there's what happens when the referee's term ends.
Election Commissioners retire into a world of comfortable options. Governorships. Positions on high-level committees. Diplomatic appointments. The system doesn't pay them in cash to stay quiet. It pays them in futures. If you spend your term at the ECI making things difficult for the party that appointed you, those futures evaporate. If you are, on the other hand, the kind of referee who is very strict about small infractions and finds something interesting to look at when large ones happen — well. People remember.
The result: the ECI is extraordinarily capable at logistics. Moving a billion voters, training lakhs of polling officers, printing the ink, sealing the boxes. Genuine world-class operational machinery.
What it is less good at: hate speech by leaders of national parties during campaign season. The massive infusion of undeclared corporate money that floods every election. The ownership of major news networks by corporations with active government contracts. These things are, depending on who you ask, "being looked into" or "matters of interpretation."
Neutrality in the face of a rigged game is just a slower form of surrender.
Back in March, while the country was distracted by whatever the news channels decided was important that week, the government slipped something into the Finance Bill of 2016. A small amendment to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act.
Here is the background.
For years — years — both the BJP and the Congress were taking money from Vedanta, a mining corporation registered abroad. Taking foreign political donations. Which is specifically, explicitly illegal under the FCRA as it existed. In 2014, the Delhi High Court reviewed the evidence and found them both guilty. Dead to rights. The documentation was there.
You know what happened next.
Instead of facing any consequence, the two parties that spend every election season screaming at each other about corruption, sovereignty, and national character sat down quietly and agreed on something. They amended the FCRA to redefine what a "foreign company" meant, in a way that retroactively made what they had done legal.
Retroactive. They backdated the amendment to 2010.
They committed a crime. Got caught. And passed a law stating it had not been a crime after all, going back six years.
I used to believe there was a real ideological war between these parties. I know better now. When the money is on the table and someone threatens to take it away, the mask drops instantly. There is no ruling party. There is no opposition. There is only the machine, which is one thing wearing two faces, and it protects itself with the reflex efficiency of a living organism.
The ECI was there for all of this. The ECI issued no statement. There were no consequences. The Finance Bill passed. The companies that had paid the bribes went back to their businesses. The parties that had taken the bribes went back to their election rallies, where they told their supporters to vote against corruption.
The tea seller is back at the corner today. He got a new kettle from somewhere — I don't know where, probably borrowed the money — and he's making tea again, keeping his head down, no doubt making sure the stamp on his paper is in exactly the right place.
That is what compliance with the rules looks like for most of us.
Somewhere in Delhi, the people who retroactively legalized their own bribery are doing interviews about the importance of electoral integrity.
I stood in line last month and pressed a button on a machine and felt nothing. Not hope. Not rage. Just the flat sensation of a ritual that has been drained of all meaning by people who are very good at draining things.
The match was fixed before it started. The referee works for both teams. And we keep buying tickets.